ヴェローナサッカー

This page uses Javascript. Please enable Javascript in your browser. Skip to Content Japanese English Chinese About RIETI Site Map Help Contact Discussion Papers Search Site Search Menu Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows According to Title Alphabetical order RIETI Alumni Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) Research Areas Fellows Research/Policy Papers Publications Events Data Articles Site Map Technical Issues Coontact Discussion Papers Search Close HomeArticlesSpecial SeriesPriorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013) Challenges for Japan's National Innovation System Tweet Print NOMI Toshihiko Consulting Fellow, RIETI The Japanese government sets the Basic Science and Technology Plan every five years. Recently, this plan has been serving as the basis for Japan's innovation policy. The next milestone is the spring of 2016 when the Fifth Basic Science Technology Plan will be laid down. Counting backwards, this means that 2015 will be the year for discussing the draft plan and 2014 the year for assessing the effects of the previous plans and identifying issues to be addressed in the forthcoming plan. Thus, as we start off 2014, I would like to present my personal view on the challenges for Japan's national innovation system. Similar innovation policies around the worldInnovation arises in principle from free economic activities in the private sector and evaluation by the market, and neoclassical economics explains that the balance of market failure and government failure provides a ground for government intervention. Based on this theory, tax reduction for research and development (R&D) investments, government protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), and some extent of public funding on R&D are justifiable because: 1) the fruits of basic research are considerable as public goods in nature; 2) even patented technology has externalities because follower companies may emulate it in such a way not to infringe the patent; and 3) research involving high risk may not attract sufficient private-sector investments. On the other hand, neo-Schumpeterian economists, such as Richard Nelson, object to considering innovation and innovation policy under the framework of neoclassical economics because innovation gives rise to the dynamic evolution of the economy. They are proposing an alternative framework designed to analyze national innovation systems. According to their theory, systemic failure—not market failure—provides a ground for government intervention. Since innovation process is path-dependent and situation-specific and thus differs from one country to another, governments are expected to intervene in accordance with problems in their respective systems. The concept of national innovation systems has been accepted by policymakers in many countries, and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) conducted a series of studies in the 1990s through the 2000s, including comparative analyses of national innovation systems across member countries.As it turned out, however, many countries pursued the same or similar innovation policy as they looked to U.S. innovation policy—the success of Silicon Valley in particular—as the benchmark. In other words, the promotion of industry-academia collaboration to facilitate the creation, transfer, and use of knowledge, the strengthening IPR protection, and the introduction of a law equivalent to the Bayh-Dole Act of the United States have virtually become a universal innovation policy for countries around the world including Japan. While these policy measures have yielded productive results, many policymakers and researchers have come to realize that it is impossible to repeat the success of Silicon Valley in all countries and regions, and the need for country-specific policies is now being discussed. This seems to be a natural consequence of the concept of national innovation systems. There is no doubt that promoting industry-academia collaboration and ensuring IPR protection will remain important. But it is about time for Japan to consider innovation policy measures focused on problems unique to its innovation system in addition to those measures mentioned above. What are the challenges unique to Japan?Then, what unique problems exist in Japan's national innovation system? A large portion of R&D in Japan is funded and carried out by the industrial sector, and excellent human resources for innovation are concentrated particularly in giant corporations. However, as they proceed with the so-called "select-and-focus" strategy to realign their business, those corporations are increasingly becoming hesitant to explore new, small markets. As the markets that require cutting-edge technologies tend to be small in size in their initial stage and often remain unnoticed by the top managers of giant corporations, this situation causes a mismatch between R&D strategy and business strategy. Such markets are suitable for smaller enterprises, and, for that matter, we should expect leadership from the top managers of small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) or the entrepreneurship of start-up businesses. However, they face constraints in both financial and human resources. Regarding financial resources, they suffer from a financial market problem, where financial institutions have a limited number of specialists to find new business opportunities, and only a limited amount of funds are made available to new businesses. Regarding human resources, there is a labor market problem. The mobility of senior researchers and engineers in the private sector remains low, even though there has been a significant increase in the mobility of university researchers. I personally believe those problems in the financial and labor markets have caused the low innovation in the goods and services markets as illustrated in the below figure.This proposition is still immature and is no more than a hypothesis. Additionally, I don't have specific policy proposals to address these problems. However, I believe that the issues discussed above need to be given serious consideration in the medium- to long-term horizon. December 27, 2013>> Original text in Japanese Reference(s) Stiglitz, Joseph E. "Economics of the Public Sector, Third Edition," W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.Kishimoto, Tetsuya, "Kokyo Keizaigaku (Shinpan) [Public Economics (New Edition)," Yuhikaku, March 1998.Nelson, Richard R., "National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis," Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.Chaminade, Cristina and Charles Edquist, "Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A system of innovation approach," in Kuhlman, S., Shapira, P., Smits, R. (eds.), The Co-evolution of Innovation Policy, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2010.Chaminade, C., Paparapong Intarakumnerd, and Koson Sapprasert, "Measuring systemic problems in National Innovation Systems. An application to Thailand," Research Policy 41, pp.1476-1488, 2012OECD, National Innovation Systems, 1997OECD, Innovative Networks: Co-operation in National Innovation Systems, 2001Tödtling, Franz and Michaela Trippl, "One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation approach," Research Policy 34(8), pp.1203-1219, 2005 Tweet December 27, 2013 Print Article(s) by this author Expectations for Open Innovation in Partnerships between Large Firms and SMEs January 6, 2016［Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2016 (January 2016)］ Reforming the Innovation System with Small and Medium Enterprises January 15, 2015［Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2015 (January 2015)］ Challenges for Japan's National Innovation System December 27, 2013［Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013)］ Articles Column Special Series Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2024 (January 2024) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2023 (January 2023) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2022 (January 2022) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2021 (January 2021) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2020 (January 2020) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2019 (January 2019) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2018 (January 2018) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2017 (January 2017) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2016 (January 2016) Fellows' Views on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2015 (January 2015) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2013 (January 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2012 (January 2012) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2009 (January 2009) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2008 (January 2008) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2007 (January 2007) RIETI Fellows' View on Incident at Japanese Consulate-General in Shenyang (June 2002) Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal Communications Newsletter RSS Feed Facebook X YouTube Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) About RIETI Privacy Policy Site Policy Site Map Help Contact METI Web Site Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, IAA (JCN 6010005005426)JCN: Japan Corporate Number Opinions expressed or implied on this website are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).Titles, numbers, specific names, etc. on this website are as of the date of publication. In the case of reposting material from our website, contact us beforehand. Top